← Stock Analysis
Blog

Four Central Banks, One Oil Shock, Four Different Answers: What It Means for Bank Stocks in the U.S., Canada, the UK and Australia

September 23, 2026  •  Written and reviewed by Berly Sam Varghese, Editor

In the space of three weeks, four of the world’s big central banks looked at the same problem — oil near $100 a barrel because of the war in the Middle East — and gave four different answers. The U.S. Federal Reserve raised rates. The Bank of Canada held for the seventh time in a row. The Bank of England held on a split vote, with three members wanting a rise. Australia’s Reserve Bank, which has already raised rates three times this year, is expected to do it again on September 29. If you own bank shares in any of these countries, that divergence is the single most important thing happening to your investment right now, and this article explains it in plain words.

First, what a central bank rate actually is

Every country has a central bank that sets one key interest rate: the rate at which banks lend to each other overnight. It is called the fed funds rate in the U.S., the cash rate in Australia, Bank Rate in the UK, and the policy rate in Canada. Commercial banks build their own lending and deposit rates on top of it. When the central bank raises its rate, borrowing gets more expensive across the economy and spending cools, which is how it fights inflation. When it cuts, the opposite happens.

That is the whole mechanism. What makes September 2026 unusual is that four central banks facing the same shock reached four different decisions, and the reasons tell you a great deal about the banks that operate under each one.

Four banks, four answers

Central bankRate nowSeptember decisionLatest inflationWhat comes next
U.S. Federal Reserve3.75–4.00%Raised 0.25% on Sept 16 — first rise since 20233.4% (core 2.4%)16 of 18 officials expect another rise in 2026
Bank of Canada2.25%Held on Sept 2 — seventh straight holdUnderlying inflation near its 2% targetNext decision Oct 28; flagged inflation risk from energy and U.S. tariffs
Bank of England3.75%Held on Sept 16 by 6 votes to 3; the three wanted a rise3.1% and expected to rise furtherNext decision Nov 5; markets price several rises by mid-2027
Reserve Bank of Australia4.35%Held in August after three rises earlier in 20263.5% (underlying 3.6%)All four major Australian banks expect a rise to 4.60% on Sept 29

Notice the spread. Australia’s rate is nearly double Canada’s. The U.S. and UK sit in the middle at the same level but moving in different directions — the Fed just raised, the Bank of England is still deciding. The oil shock is the same for all four. The difference is what else is going on in each economy.

Why the same oil price produced different decisions

That last point matters for the whole article. How quickly a rate change reaches households depends on how mortgages work in each country. U.S. mortgages are mostly fixed for 30 years, so a rise barely touches existing borrowers. Canadian mortgages typically reset every five years. UK mortgages are usually fixed for two to five years. Australian mortgages mostly float. The same 0.25% rise is a non-event for a U.S. homeowner and an immediate bill for an Australian one — and for the banks that lend to them.

What a rate decision does to a bank’s profits, in one paragraph

A bank makes most of its money on the gap between what it charges borrowers and what it pays savers. That gap, measured in dollars, is called net interest income; you will see it on the first line of every bank’s income statement. When the central bank raises rates, banks usually raise loan rates faster than deposit rates, so the gap widens and profit rises — at first. Over the following year, savers move their money to wherever pays most and the bank has to raise deposit rates to keep them, so the gap narrows again. And higher rates eventually mean some borrowers cannot pay, so bad-loan costs rise last. A rate rise is good for a bank in year one, mixed in year two, and depends on the economy in year three. A rate cut runs the film backwards.

So the question for a bank shareholder is not “did rates go up?” It is “where is this bank in that three-year film?” The table of central banks above answers it: Australian banks are deepest into the cycle, UK and U.S. banks are at the start of a new rise, and Canadian banks are in the calm middle with no move in either direction.

The banks themselves, from their filings

Below are the largest listed banks in each country that trade in the U.S. and are covered on Investor Sam, with two numbers from their most recent annual filings. Return on equity is the profit a bank makes each year for every dollar shareholders have invested in it — 10% is ordinary, 15% is excellent. Price-to-book is what the market pays for each dollar of the bank’s own net worth; a bank earning a 10% return is usually worth about 1× book, and a bank earning 15% deserves more.

BankCountryReturn on equityPrice-to-bookInvestor Sam verdict
JPMorgan (JPM)U.S.15.7%2.5×SELL
Bank of America (BAC)U.S.10.1%1.4×SELL
Royal Bank of Canada (RY)Canada14.6%2.1×HOLD
Toronto-Dominion (TD)Canada16.1%see noteHOLD
Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS)Canada9.0%1.5×SELL
HSBC (HSBC)UK11.7%1.5×SELL
Lloyds (LYG)UK9.8%1.4×SELL
Barclays (BCS)UK9.2%1.0×SELL

Note on the verdicts: Investor Sam’s five-pillar rating treats the deposits a bank holds as debt, which gives every bank in the world a financial-health score of zero and drags the overall rating to SELL. That is a known limitation of applying a factory’s balance-sheet rules to a bank, and we explain the five checks that work instead in how to analyze a bank stock when the Fed hikes. For this table, read the return on equity and price-to-book columns and ignore the composite. (TD’s price-to-book is omitted because the share price on its ratios page is currently mis-stated; we are correcting the data.)

Two patterns stand out once you read it that way:

  1. Canada’s big two earn like America’s best. RY at 14.6% and TD at 16.1% are in JPMorgan territory, and RY trades at a similar premium to book. The difference is the rate environment: they earned those returns with their central bank holding at 2.25%, not hiking, which means less of a year-one boost ahead but also less of the year-three credit risk. TD’s return doubled from 7.7% the year before, which is the number to understand before buying — open its income statement and look for what changed.
  2. The UK banks are the cheapest, and the market is telling you why. Barclays at 1.0× book and Lloyds at 1.4× earn 9–10% on equity, which is fine but not special, while facing a central bank that is about to start raising into an economy with 3.1% inflation and rising energy bills. Year one of a hiking cycle is the good year for them; the market is pricing years two and three.

What to do with this, country by country

If you own U.S. banks: the Fed just gave them the year-one boost. Bank of America has disclosed that a further 1% rise in rates adds about $1 billion to its annual net interest income; the flip side is that credit-card and commercial-property losses rise with a lag. Watch the provision line each quarter.

If you own Canadian banks: nothing changed on September 2 and nothing is expected on October 28. The risk is not rates; it is tariffs and the five-year mortgage-renewal cycle, in which borrowers who locked in at 2% in 2021 are now renewing at higher rates. That is the line to read in the risk section of each bank’s filing.

If you own UK banks: a rise is coming, probably before mid-2027, and Lloyds — the most domestic and mortgage-heavy of the three — benefits most in year one. HSBC earns most of its money in Asia, so the Bank of England matters less to it than the Fed and China do.

If you own Australian banks: the major Australian lenders are not yet on Investor Sam, but the principle from the table applies: they are deepest into the cycle, so their year-one boost is behind them and the credit question is in front. For the Australian companies we do cover, the miners BHP and Rio Tinto, the Reserve Bank matters far less than the price of iron ore.

How to keep watching this

The compare tool lines up any two or three of the banks above so you can see return on equity and price-to-book on one screen; JPMorgan against Royal Bank of Canada is the pair that teaches the most. The screener lets you filter the whole coverage universe by return on equity if you want to find the banks you do not already know. And on any company page you can ask Ask Sam, our filing-grounded analyst, a plain question like “how much of this bank’s lending is residential mortgages?” and get an answer with the section of the filing it came from. Set an alert on the names you hold and you will hear when a new filing changes the numbers in the table above.

Frequently asked questions

Why did Canada hold when everyone else is raising?

Because Canada exports oil, so the energy shock helps its economy as much as it hurts consumers, and because its underlying inflation stayed near 2%. Its central bank is more worried about U.S. tariffs slowing Canadian growth than about inflation. That could change if energy prices stay high; the next decision is October 28.

Does a rate rise always help banks?

Only at first. It widens the gap between loan and deposit rates for about a year, then savers demand more and borrowers start to struggle. A bank in the first year of a cycle (UK, U.S.) looks better than one in the third (Australia). Canadian banks are in neither, which is its own kind of safety.

Where do the numbers in the bank table come from?

From each bank’s most recent annual filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission — a 10-K for the U.S. banks and a 40-F or 20-F for the Canadian and UK ones — as computed on Investor Sam. Central-bank figures are from the banks’ own September 2026 statements.

Sources

BV

Berly Sam Varghese is the founder and editor of Investor Sam. He has been investing in public markets since 2010 and reviews and approves every guide before it is published. More about Investor Sam →